Explaining Economic Change:The Interplay Between Cognition and Institutions
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Legal Theory
- Vol. 3 (3) , 211-226
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352325200000768
Abstract
Economic theory is built on assumptions about human behavior—assumptions embodied in rational-choice theory. Underlying these assumptions are implicit notions about how we think and learn. These implicit notions are fundamentally important to social explanation. The very plausibility of the explanations that we develop out of rational-choice theory rests crucially on the accuracy of these notions about cognition and rationality. But there is a basic problem: There is often very little relationship between the assumptions that rational-choice theorists make and the way that humans actually act and learn in everyday life. This has significant implications for economic theory and practice. It leads to bad theories and inadequate explanations; it produces bad predictions and, thus, supports ineffective social policies.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cognition in the WildPublished by MIT Press ,1995
- Understanding Business CyclesPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1995
- Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist SocietiesJournal of Political Economy, 1994
- Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and InstitutionsKyklos, 1994
- Rational Choice and Social TheoryThe Journal of Philosophy, 1994
- Is Talk Really Cheap? Prompting Conversation between Critical Theory and Rational ChoiceAmerican Political Science Review, 1993
- Institutions and Social ConflictPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1992
- Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic PerformancePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Alternative Approaches to the Theory of Choice in Risk-Taking SituationsEconometrica, 1951