Norms in Conflict and Confusion

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Political conflict involves the conflict of norms, yet resolution of political conflict requires that the disputants share some norms about conflict resolution. This presents a problem at the global level, where no such shared normative framework exists. The world is increasingly interconnected, yet the peoples of the world continue to embrace ideas of separateness that are reinforced by their various normative systems. Six major "stories"-worldviews or paradigms-compete in the current postmodern world: the Western-style mystique of progress, Christian fundamentalism, Islamic fundamentalism, Marxist revolutionary ideology, Green politics, and the "new paradigm." Each is in conflict with other normative systems, and none is adequate to serve as the normative framework for a global society. Whether or not such a society emerges will depend on the development of an ability to deal with information-not only data and concepts, but also "meta-information" about the uses and limitations of information. Whatever the norms of a global information culture, its emergence will be accompanied by a protracted period of conflict and great stress for individuals and institutions of governance. Humanistic psychology, although not the keeper of a "new paradigm," may contribute to our understanding of this historical moment and of the human need to find and create social meaning.

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit: