Generalizing from Laboratory Studies to Field Studies of Human Stress Physiology
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Psychosomatic Medicine
- Vol. 46 (5) , 463-469
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-198409000-00007
Abstract
In studying physiologic responses to behavioral stressors, there are two competing strategies. Laboratory studies offer greater experimental control but less provocation. Field studies provide poorer experimental control but potentially greater provocation. Despite these differences, comparison within subjects of neuroendocrine responses to these different settings has not been performed. We studied 11 healthy young men in the field during public speaking and in the laboratory during carefully controlled mental arithmetic calculations. There were marked differences in self-report and in plasma levels of catecholamines in the two settings.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressuresJAMA, 1983
- Type A Behavior and Elevated Physiological and Neuroendocrine Responses to Cognitive TasksScience, 1982
- II. Validity and reliability of liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection for measuring plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine in manLife Sciences, 1981
- Short-Term Catecholamine Response to Psychological Stress1Psychosomatic Medicine, 1980
- Effect of Harassment and Competition Upon Cardiovascular and Plasma Catecholamine Responses in Type A and Type B IndividualsPsychophysiology, 1980
- Plasma catecholamines in stress and exerciseJAMA, 1980
- Individual differences in somatic response patterns.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1950