THE RECOGNITION OF PRIMARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM
- 8 December 1945
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 129 (15) , 994-1002
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1945.02860490006003
Abstract
The discovery that hyperparathyroidism is the cause of generalized osteitis fibrosa cystica has led to a widespread assumption that hyperparathyroidism manifests itself only as a disease of bone.1 Because osteitis fibrosa cystica is a great rarity, it has been assumed that hyperparathyroidism is equally rare. Both of these assumptions have been proved to be false but they have nonetheless persisted. In 1934 Albright and his associates2 at the Massachusetts General Hospital reported 17 proved cases of hyperparathyroidism, most of which they had observed during a period of two years. Analysis of these cases led them to conclude that (1) hyperparathyroidism can occur without evident disease of bone, (2) involvement of the urinary tract is a more common and more important manifestation of hyperparathyroidism than involvement of the skeleton, (3) hyperparathyroidism is relatively common and (4) it is the etiologic factor in the formation of renal calculi in anKeywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- PRIMARY AND SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISMArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1943
- BLOOD CALCIUM, PHOSPHORUS AND PHOSPHATASE IN URINARY LITHIASISJAMA, 1938
- The pathology of the parathyroid gland in hyperparathyroidism - A study of 25 cases1935
- A CASE OF OSTEITIS FIBROSA CYSTICA (OSTEOMALACIA?) WITH EVIDENCE OF HYPERACTIVITY OF THE PARA-THYROID BODIES. METABOLIC STUDY I 1Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1930