A distributed approach for estimating catchment evapotranspiration: comparison of the combination equation and the complementary relationship approaches
- 21 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Hydrological Processes
- Vol. 17 (8) , 1509-1523
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1196
Abstract
In large river basins, there may be considerable variations in both climate and land use across the region. The evapotranspiration that occurs over a basin may be drastically different from one part of the region to another. The potential influence of these variations in evapotranspiration estimated for the catchment is weakened by using a spatially based distributed hydrological model in such a study. Areal evapotranspiration is estimated by means of approaches requiring only meteorological data: the combination equation (CE) model and the complementary relationship approach—the complementary relationship areal evapotranspiration (CRAE) and advection–aridity (AA) models. The capability of three models to estimate the evapotranspiration of catchments with complex topography and land‐use classification is investigated, and the models are applied to two catchments with different characteristics and scales for several representative years. Daily, monthly, and annual evapotranspiration are estimated with different accuracy. The result shows that the modified CE model may underestimate the evapotranspiration in some cases. The CRAE and AA models seem to be two kinds of effective alternatives for estimating catchment evapotranspiration. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration: An enhanced advection‐aridity modelWater Resources Research, 2001
- The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration: The complementary relationship areal evapotranspiration and advection‐aridity modelsWater Resources Research, 2001
- A distributed physical approach for surface-subsurface water transport modeling in agricultural watershedsJournal of Hydrology, 1997
- Modeling Evapotranspiration and Surface Energy Budgets Across a WatershedWater Resources Research, 1996
- Comparison of the Evaporative Fraction and the Priestley‐Taylor α for Parameterizing Daytime EvaporationWater Resources Research, 1996
- On the Concept of Equilibrium Evaporation and the Value of the Priestley‐Taylor CoefficientWater Resources Research, 1996
- Spatial variation in evapotranspiration and the influence of land use on catchment hydrologyJournal of Hydrology, 1995
- Comparison of energy fluxes calculated with the Penman-Monteith equation and the vegetation models SiB and CupidJournal of Hydrology, 1995
- Modelling catchment evaporation: An objective comparison of the Penman and Morton approachesJournal of Hydrology, 1990
- An advection‐aridity approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspirationWater Resources Research, 1979