Reassessing Evidence for Competitive Exclusion of Introduced Natural Enemies
- 1 February 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Environmental Entomology
- Vol. 13 (1) , 192-195
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/13.1.192
Abstract
Data presented by Ehler and Hall (1982; Environ. Entomol. 11: 1–4), suggesting that competitive exclusion among introduced natural enemies has probably occurred, may be interpreted differently. Possible biases in the entomological literature and success-directed selection of natural enemies for release might have produced an apparent inverse relationship between rate of establishment of introduced natural enemies and number of species released. Intense competition among beneficial species is not likely to occur during attempted colonization when pests are abundant.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trichogramma pretiosum 1 : Effect of Prerelease Parasitization Experience on Retention in Release Areas and Efficiency 23Environmental Entomology, 1981
- Coccinella septempunctata 1 in the United States: Recolonizations and Notes on Its EcologyEnvironmental Entomology, 1979
- THE PRACTICE AND THEORY OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INSECTS IN CANADACanadian Journal of Zoology, 1961
- The Employment of Exotic Entomophagous Insects in Pest Control1Journal of Economic Entomology, 1959