Funding Government Training Schemes: Mechanisms and Consequences
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal of Education & Work
- Vol. 7 (3) , 21-42
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0269000940070302
Abstract
This paper follows the path of public funds allocated to private institutions‐‐Training and Enterprise Councils (TECs)‐‐which, in turn, fund the delivery of Youth Training (soon to be replaced by Youth Credits) and Training for Work. The paper argues that the terms on which funds are allocated to TECs offers little financial incentive for TECs to support high cost, high quality training since their success and cost effectiveness is measured by indicators which take no account of the type of training provided, to whom it is provided and by whom. A TECs performance rating can only be improved if it devotes more of its resources to support for the cheapest, easiest and quickest routes to the government's set of output measures. However, this will do little to cure Britain's well‐known deficiencies in intermediate skills in occupations in which it is costly and lengthy to train.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation, decentralisation and accountabilityPolicy Studies, 1992
- The trade union viewPolicy Studies, 1992
- Taking forward the skills revolutionPolicy Studies, 1992
- Evaluating local labour market policy: the case of TECsBritish Journal of Education & Work, 1992
- Strategic Development Issues Facing TECs in the North WestBritish Journal of Education & Work, 1992
- The Stratification of Youth Training∗British Journal of Education & Work, 1992
- The Politics of Training in Britain: Contradictions in the TEC InitiativeCapital & Class, 1991
- Letting the market decide (with public money): Training and Enterprise Councils and the future of labour market programmesCritical Social Policy, 1991