A Comparison of Prediction Models for Fractures in Older Women
Open Access
- 14 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 169 (22) , 2087-2094
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.404
Abstract
Advanced age and low bone mineral density (BMD) are strongly associated with higher fracture risk in older women.1 Data from randomized trials support the recommendation to initiate pharmacologic therapy to lower fracture risk among older women with osteoporosis as defined by BMD T scores of −2.5 or less (at least 2.5 SDs below average for healthy young women). However, despite a lower risk of fracture, more fractures occur in the much larger group of older women without osteoporosis (BMD T scores above −2.5) in whom there is much less certainty about the efficacy of drug therapy.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- FRAX and Risk of Vertebral Fractures: The Fracture Intervention TrialJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2009
- Estimates of the Proportion of Older White Women Who Would Be Recommended for Pharmacologic Treatment by the New U.S. National Osteoporosis Foundation GuidelinesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2009
- Assessing New Biomarkers and Predictive Models for Use in Clinical PracticeArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2008
- Ten-year fracture probability identifies women who will benefit from clodronate therapy—additional results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised studyOsteoporosis International, 2008
- Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysisOsteoporosis International, 2004
- A Meta-Analysis of Prior Corticosteroid Use and Fracture RiskJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2004
- Communicating Evidence for Participatory Decision MakingJAMA, 2004
- Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture riskThe Lancet, 2002
- Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fracturesThe Lancet, 2002
- Effect of Risedronate on the Risk of Hip Fracture in Elderly WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001