Accuracy and precision of clinical estimation of leg length inequality and lumbar scoliosis: Comparison of clinical and radiological measurements
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Disability Studies
- Vol. 10 (2) , 49-53
- https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288809164098
Abstract
The results of 196 clinical determinations of leg length inequality and postural pelvic tilt scoliosis in 21 patients were analysed and compared with reliable radiological measurements. Clinical methods proved to be inaccurate and highly imprecise, the observer error being +/- 8.6 mm for direct and +/- 7.5 mm for indirect measurement of leg length inequality, and +/- 6.4 degrees for the estimation of postural lumbar scoliosis. More than half (53%) of the observations were erroneous when the criterion of leg length inequality was 5 mm. Failure to determine the presence or absence of length inequality of more than 5 mm occurred in 54 measurements (27% of the total). In 12% of the direct and in 13% of the indirect measurements, the observers erred in deciding which leg was longer; discrepancies occurred even when radiological reading gave a leg length inequality of as much as 25 mm.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The statics of postural pelvic tilt scoliosis; a radiographic study on 288 consecutive chronic LBP patientsClinical Biomechanics, 1987
- Biomechanical significance of the correct length of lower limb prosthesesProsthetics and Orthotics International, 1984
- DOES UNEQUAL LEG LENGTH CAUSE BACK PAIN?The Lancet, 1984
- Leg Length Discrepancy Assessment: Accuracy and Precision in Five Clinical Methods of EvaluationJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1984
- Clinical Symptoms and Biomechanics of Lumbar Spine and Hip Joint in Leg Length InequalitySpine, 1983
- The Accuracy of Measuring Leg-length DifferencesBMJ, 1955