Centralisation of Oesophagogastric Cancer Services: Can Specialist Units Deliver?
Open Access
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Surgeons of England in The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Vol. 88 (6) , 566-570
- https://doi.org/10.1308/003588406x130624
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oesophagogastric cancer surgery is increasingly being performed in only centralised units. The aim of the study was to examine surgical outcomes and service delivery within a specialist unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS The case notes of all patients undergoing attempted oesophagogastrectomy between January 2000 and May 2003 were identified from a prospective consultant database. RESULTS A total of 187 patients (median age, 63 years; range, 29–83 years; M:F ratio, 3.9:1) underwent attempted oesophagogastrectomy. Of these, 91% were seen within 2 weeks of referral and treatment was instituted after a mean of 31 days (range, 1–109 days). More patients underwent surgery (63%) than neoadjuvant therapy (56%) within 1 month of referral. The main indication for surgery was invasive malignancy in 166 patients (89%). The 30-day mortality was 0.5% (1 death) and in-hospital mortality was 1.1% (2 deaths). The median length of hospital stay was 14 days (range, 7–69 days). Significant postoperative morbidity included: pulmonary complications (36%), cardiovascular complications (16%), wound infection (13%) and clinically significant anastomotic leaks (7%). Of the study group, 28 patients (15%) were admitted to ICU with a median stay of 10 days (range, 1–44 days); this accounted for 0.9% of ICU bed availability. Twelve patients (6.4%) were returned to theatre, most commonly for bleeding. The 1-year survival rates were 78%. During 2002–2003, national waiting list targets for both hernia repair and cholecystectomy were achieved. CONCLUSIONS Despite recent increases in workload, high volume specialist units can deliver an efficient and timely service with both good treatment outcomes and minimal impact upon elective surgical waiting lists and ICU provision.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early impact of centralization of oesophageal cancer surgery servicesBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rateBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort studyBMJ, 2003
- Cohort study in South and West England of the influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancersBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardiaBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancerGut, 2001
- Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancerThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2000
- Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Medical audit, cancer registration, and survival in ovarian cancerThe Lancet, 1991
- Effect of surgical experience on the results of resection for oesophageal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986