Analysis of Judgment Policy: A New Approach for Citizen Participation in Planning
- 1 January 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Institute of Planners
- Vol. 42 (1) , 33-41
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367608977702
Abstract
Analysis of judgment policy is a technique for obtaining priorities and trade-offs among several issues considered in combination. This procedure was used in an illustrative study of the judgments of city council members and members of local interest groups. The analysis resulted in mathematical and pictorial descriptions of several points of view. The points of view differed with regard to the relative importance of issues and the form of the relation between individual issues and overall judgments. It was found that die city council members were not able to predict the judgments of even the most vocal interest group members. This finding, consistent with laboratory studies, suggests that traditional means for communication between citizens and public officials are inadequate. It is proposed that analysis of judgment policy can be used to obtain improved citizen input for planning.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of seven methods for obtaining subjective descriptions of judgmental policyOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975
- An Alternate Approach to Labor-Management RelationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1973
- Computer Graphics as an Aid to LearningScience, 1971
- Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker's decision process.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969
- New Directions in Research on Conflict ResolutionJournal of Social Issues, 1965
- Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability studies.Psychological Review, 1964
- The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment.Psychological Bulletin, 1960
- Probabilistic functioning and the clinical method.Psychological Review, 1955