Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Closure Versus Medical Therapy for Patent Foramen Ovale in Prevention of Recurrent Neurological Events After Presumed Paradoxical Embolism

This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:

• Study Design of the CLOSURE I Trial
  Stroke, 2010
• Late Results After Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Secondary Prevention of Paradoxical Embolism Using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder Without Intraprocedural Echocardiography
  JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2009
• Recurrent Stroke and Massive Right-to-Left Shunt
  Stroke, 2008
• Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with presumed paradoxical embolism: Periprocedural results and midterm risk of recurrent neurologic events
  American Heart Journal, 2008
• Comparison of Three Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Devices in a Randomized Trial (Amplatzer Versus CardioSEAL-STARflex Versus Helex Occluder)
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 2008
• Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale: A Case Series and Literature Review
  Clinical Medicine & Research, 2007
• Recurrent cerebrovascular ischaemic events in patients with interatrial septal abnormalities: a follow-up study
  Neurological Sciences, 2006
• Secondary prevention after cryptogenic cerebrovascular events in patients with patent foramen ovale
  International Journal of Cardiology, 2005
• Recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both and cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack
  American Heart Journal, 1995
• Patent foramen ovale and brain infarct. Echocardiographic predictors, recurrence, and prevention.
  Stroke, 1994