Analysis of the performance characteristics of the five‐channel Microtops II Sun photometer for measuring aerosol optical thickness and precipitable water vapor
Top Cited Papers
- 12 July 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 107 (D13)
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001302
Abstract
Five Microtops II Sun photometers were studied in detail at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) to determine their performance in measuring aerosol optical thickness (AOT or τaλ) and precipitable column water vapor (W). Each derives τaλ from measured signals at four wavelengths λ (340, 440, 675, and 870 nm), and W from the 936 nm signal measurements. Accuracy of τaλ and W determination depends on the reliability of the relevant channel calibration coefficient (V0). Relative calibration by transfer of parameters from a more accurate Sun photometer (such as the Mauna‐Loa‐calibrated AERONET master Sun photometer at GSFC) is more reliable than Langley calibration performed at GSFC. It was found that the factory‐determined value of the instrument constant for the 936 nm filter (k = 0.7847) used in the Microtops' internal algorithm is unrealistic, causing large errors in V0(936), τa936, and W. Thus, when applied for transfer calibration at GSFC, whereas the random variation of V0 at 340 to 870 nm is quite small, with coefficients of variation (CV) in the range of 0 to 2.4%, at 936 nm the CV goes up to 19%. Also, the systematic temporal variation of V0 at 340 to 870 nm is very slow, while at 936 nm it is large and exhibits a very high dependence on W. The algorithm also computes τa936 as 0.91 τa870, which is highly simplistic. Therefore, it is recommended to determine τa936 by logarithmic extrapolation from τa675 and τa870. From the operational standpoint of the Microtops, apart from errors that may result from unperceived cloud contamination, the main sources of error include inaccurate pointing to the Sun, neglecting to clean the front quartz window, and neglecting to calibrate correctly. If these three issues are adequately taken care of, the Microtops can be quite accurate and stable, with root‐mean‐square (rms) differences between corresponding retrievals from clean calibrated Microtops and the AERONET Sun photometer being about ±0.02 at 340 nm, decreasing down to about ±0.01 at 870 nm.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of MODIS aerosol optical depth retrieval over landGeophysical Research Letters, 2002
- Validation of MODIS aerosol retrieval over oceanGeophysical Research Letters, 2002
- Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosolsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1999
- AERONET—A Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol CharacterizationRemote Sensing of Environment, 1998
- Sun photometric measurements of atmospheric water vapor column abundance in the 940‐nm bandJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997
- Comparison of modeled and empirical approaches for retrieving columnar water vapor from solar transmittance measurements in the 0.94‐μm regionJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996
- Comparison of Sun photometer calibration by use of the Langley technique and the standard lampApplied Optics, 1995
- Features and effects of aerosol optical depth observed at Mauna Loa, Hawaii: 1982–1992Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994
- Rayleigh optical depth comparisons from various sourcesApplied Optics, 1990
- The Refractive Index of AirMetrologia, 1966