Colposacropexy with Gore-tex mesh in marked vaginal and uterovaginal prolapse.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This study focusses on abdominal sacral colpopexy which appears to provide the most anatomically correct restoration and secure and durable support for advanced vaginal or uterovaginal prolapse. 21 patients underwent colposacropexy or hysterocolposacropexy using Gore-tex mesh. All patients referred symptoms of vaginal heaviness and urinary dysfunctions. Five presented with complete vaginal vault prolapse, 7 with third-degree anterior colpoceles and 9 with uterovaginal prolapse. Hydronephrosis was present in 4. Five patients had previously undergone total hysterectomy, and underwent only sacropexy; 9 underwent standard total abdominal hysterectomy before sacropexy; 7 underwent hysterocolposacropexy, preserving the uterus. In colposacropexy anchorage was designed to provide a large vagina-mesh contact area thus reducing the risk of suspension failure. Hysterocolposacropexy was performed using 3 stitches to anchor the synthetic mesh to the vagina and the uterine isthmus. Postoperative follow-up times range from 12 to 68 months. Overall results for 19/21 patients were satisfactory. In all 21 patients the descensus was markedly reduced. Hydronephrosis was completely resolved. Slight incontinence persisted in 3, but protection was not required. Slight dysuria persisted in 2. First-degree cystoceles recurred only in 3 patients who underwent hysterocolposacropexy. Sacropexy with synthetic mesh seems to be the most valid support of uterovaginal prolapse as the physiological vaginal axis is restored and vaginal function is preserved. Our success rate and the overall satisfaction expressed by 19/21 patients have encouraged us to continue in this surgical approach.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: