Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trials
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 368 (9546) , 1470-1472
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69615-3
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2006
- Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidenceBMJ, 2005
- Reply to Badri et al. on ‘Limited benefit of antiretroviral resistance testing in treatment-experienced patients: a meta-analysis’AIDS, 2005
- Antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis in childrenPublished by Wiley ,2005
- Limited benefit of antiretroviral resistance testing in treatment-experienced patientsAIDS, 2004
- Treatment for Adult HIV InfectionJAMA, 2004
- Clinical efficacy of antiretroviral combination therapy based on protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors: indirect comparison of controlled trialsBMJ, 2004
- Randomised trials comparing chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: biases and evolution over timeEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2003
- Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisonsStatistics in Medicine, 2002