The Painful Prescription
- 30 October 1986
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 315 (18) , 1169-1170
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198610303151821
Abstract
To the Editor: In their Sounding Board article (May 22 issue),1 Miller and Miller suggest that our evidence2 for rationing in Great Britain was based solely, and erroneously, on the finding that fewer technology-intensive procedures are performed in Great Britain than in the United States. If the authors had read beyond the chapter summaries, they could not have made this serious mistake. In our study, we presented compelling, direct evidence of wide-spread rationing. For example, we reported that the British allowed many patients with renal failure to die untreated, including nearly all patients over the age of 55, even those . . .Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Painful Prescription:a Procrustean Perspective?New England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Rationing, justice, and the American physicianJAMA, 1986
- Stopping Long-Term DialysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting.BMJ, 1985
- A COMPARISON OF INTENSIVE CARE IN THE U.S.A. AND FRANCEThe Lancet, 1982
- Symposium: Treatment of Diabetic Coma: Diabetic KetoacidosisJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1980