Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 53 (3) , 275-282
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(01)70398-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is there bias in the selection of abstracts for presentation at the DDW?Gastroenterology, 1998
- Acceptance by the aga is the single best indicator of subsequent full publication of researchGastroenterology, 1998
- Gastroenterology: An international journalGastroenterology, 1995
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Publication bias and clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1987
- Are published manuscripts representative of the surgical meeting abstracts? An objective appraisalJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1987
- Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Publication of Research Presented at the Pediatric MeetingsAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children, 1985
- News Reports of Medical Meetings: How Reliable Are Abstracts?New England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Fate of Cardiology Research Originally Published in Abstract Form | NEJMNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980