The efficacy and safety of intensive statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
- 26 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 178 (5) , 576-584
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070675
Abstract
Background: Recent lipid guidelines recommend aggressive low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering in patients with coronary artery disease. To clarify the evidence for this recommendation, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared different intensities of statin therapy. Methods: We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Registery of Controlled Trials, Web of Science) for randomized controlled trials published up to July 19, 2007, that compared statin regimens of different intensities in adults with coronary artery disease and that reported cardiovascular events or mortality. Data were pooled using random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (OR). Results: A total of 7 trials (29 395 patients) were included. Compared with less intensive statin regimens, more intensive regimens further reduced LDL levels (0.72 mmol/L reduction, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.84 mmol/L), and reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77–0.91) and stroke (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.95). Although there was no effect on mortality among patients with chronic coronary artery disease (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.80–1.14), all-cause mortality was reduced among patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with more intensive statin regimens (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61–0.93). Compared with lower intensity regimens, more intensive regimens were associated with small absolute increases in rates of drug discontinuation (2.5%), elevated levels of aminotransferases (1%) and myopathy (0.5%), and there was no difference in noncardiovascular mortality. All 7 trials reported events by randomization arm rather than by LDL level achieved. About half of the patients treated with more intensive statin therapy did not achieve an LDL level of less than 2.0 mmol/L, and none of the trials tested combination therapies. Interpretation: Our analysis supports the use of more intensive statin regimens in patients with established coronary artery disease. There is insufficient evidence to advocate treating to particular LDL targets, using combination lipid-lowering therapy to achieve these targets or for using more intensive regimens in patients without established coronary artery disease.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Intensive Versus Moderate Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Myocardial Ischemia in Older Patients With Coronary Heart DiseaseCirculation, 2007
- Risks Associated With Statin TherapyCirculation, 2006
- The Issue of Statin SafetyCirculation, 2005
- Achieving lipoprotein goals in patients at high risk with severe hypercholesterolemia: Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe co-administered with atorvastatinAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control studyThe Lancet, 2004
- Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III GuidelinesCirculation, 2004
- Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dlJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- ARBITER: Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing CholesterolCirculation, 2002
- Serum cholesterol concentration and coronary heart disease in population with low cholesterol concentrations.BMJ, 1991