Outcome prediction for individual intensive care patients: Useful, misused, or abused?
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 21 (9) , 770-776
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01704747
Abstract
Probabilities of hospital mortality provide meaningful information in many contexts, such as in discussions of patient prognosis by intensive care physicians, in patient stratification for analysis of clinical trial data by researchers, and in hospital reimbursement analysis by insurers. Use of probabilities as binary predictors based on a cut point can be misleading for making treatment decisions for individual patients, however, even when model performance is good overall. Alternative models for estimating severity of illness in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, while demonstrating good agreement for describing patients in the aggregate, are shown to differ considerably for individual patients. This suggests that identifying patients unlikely to benefit from ICU care by using models must be approached with considerable caution.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling the Severity of Illness of ICU PatientsJAMA, 1994
- Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 or 72 hoursCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- Predicting outcome in ICU patientsIntensive Care Medicine, 1994
- A New Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) Based on a European/North American Multicenter StudyJAMA, 1993
- A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter studyJAMA, 1993
- Predicting Outcome after ICU AdmissionChest, 1992
- Critical careCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- The APACHE III Prognostic SystemChest, 1991
- APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.1985
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985