The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of International Law
- Vol. 95 (3) , 535-578
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2668492
Abstract
How does the World Trade Organization (WTO) relate to the wider corpus of public international law? What, in turn, is the role of public international law in WTO dispute settlement? This paper aims at resolving these two difficult questions. No straightforward answers to them can be found in WTO rules. Yet answering them has major ramifications both for the WTO (is the WTO a largely “self-contained regime” or is it not?) and for international law (is the future of international law further fragmentation or increased unity?). This exercise will be conducted under the law as it stands today—that is, the law as it may be invoked at present before the WTO “judiciary” (panels and the Appellate Body). Of course, WTO members (viz., the WTO “legislator”) could clarify or change the relationship between WTO rules and other rules of international law. However, it is unlikely that such changes will occur any time soon. In part I, I examine the general relationship between public international law and WTO law. I then assess, more specifically, the role of public international law in WTO dispute settlement in part II and offer some conclusions in part III.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The GATT 1994 and other Annex 1A agreements: four different relationships?Journal of International Economic Law, 2000
- Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules-Toward a More Collective ApproachAmerican Journal of International Law, 2000
- The WTO in international law: tradition continued or new frontier?Journal of International Economic Law, 2000
- The GATT and the GATS: Should They Be Mutually Exclusive Agreements?Leiden Journal of International Law, 1999
- WTO Dispute Settlement: Praise and Suggestions for ReformInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1998
- Evidence, proof and persuasion in WTO dispute settlement. Who bears the burden?Journal of International Economic Law, 1998
- Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and JurisdictionInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1997
- The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less Is MoreAmerican Journal of International Law, 1996
- The Future of International Judicial InstitutionsInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1995
- Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?American Journal of International Law, 1983