More than one bite at the APEL — contrasting models of accrediting prior learning
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Further and Higher Education
- Vol. 16 (3) , 39-51
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877920160305
Abstract
This paper describes and analyses two models of practice used to accredit prior experiential learning: The competence‐based credit exchange model, and the developmental model, where documentary evidence is supported by a reflective commentary. The origins and contrasting philosophies of the two models are discussed, and the developmental model recommended as more appropriate for the accreditation of professional experience. A link is made between developmental APEL practice and the tradition of teacher‐based action research; both are identified as ways of supporting personal and professional development.Keywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- Formal Models versus Human Situational Understanding: Inherent Limitations on the Modeling of Business ExpertisePublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1981