MICROANALYSIS OF CONCRETE REASONING III
- 1 March 1966
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 7 (1) , 164-167
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1966.tb01349.x
Abstract
The weaknesses and merits of a Piagetean and an information‐processing point of view are briefly discussed. It is concluded that a detailed diagnosis of the actual psychological processes is necessary before one can decide upon the usefulness of alternative formal models. The high inter‐ and intra‐individual variability makes it necessary to base the analyses on the asymptotic performance level of individual subjects. Response latency may be a very sensitive measure of complexity.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Information theory and figure perception: The metaphor that failedActa Psychologica, 1966
- MICROANALYSIS OF CONCRETE REASONING.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1966
- PERFORMANCE ON MEASUREMENT AND PSEUDOMEASUREMENT TASKS BY FIVE- TO SEVEN-YEAR-OLD CHILDRENScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1966
- MICROANALYSIS OF CONCRETE REASONING II..Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1966
- The Development of Transitivity of Length: A Comment on Braine's ReplyChild Development, 1965
- Development of a Grasp of Transitivity of Length: A Reply to SmedslundChild Development, 1964
- DEVELOPMENT OF CONCRETE TRANSITIVITY OF LENGTH IN CHILDREN1Child Development, 1963
- Some psychological studies of grammar.American Psychologist, 1962
- Some Effects of Negative Instances on the Formation of Simple ConceptsPsychological Reports, 1962
- THE ACQUISITION OF CONSERVATION OF SUBSTANCE AND WEIGHT IN CHILDRENScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1961