The Moral Character of Mad Scientists: A Cultural Critique of Science
- 1 October 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Vol. 17 (4) , 411-437
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700401
Abstract
The mad scientist stories of fiction and film are exercises in antirationalism, particularly its Gothic horror variant. As such, they convey the argument that rationalist secular science is dangerous, and their principal device for doing so is to invest the evil of science in the personality of the scientist. To understand this cultural critique of science, it is necessary to understand how the symbols of the scientist's personality are manipulated. This article argues that mad scientists become increasingly amoral as nineteenth-century texts are adapted to twentieth-century films. The consequence is that this cultural critique is becoming even more severe, due to external reasons independent of the glories or the crimes of real scientists.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Physicist as Mad ScientistBulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 1988
- I. The Ambiguous Heritage of FrankensteinPublished by University of California Press ,1979
- XI. The Stage and Film Children of Frankenstein: A SurveyPublished by University of California Press ,1979
- Dr. Strangelove, Red Alert , and Patterns of Paranoia in the 1950’sJournal of Popular Film, 1976
- Pop Science: The Depiction of Science in Popular CulturePublished by Springer Nature ,1976
- Science and Social AttitudesScience, 1969
- The College-Student Image of the ScientistScience, 1961
- Image of the Scientist among High-School StudentsScience, 1957