Detrending, stylized facts and the business cycle
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Econometrics
- Vol. 8 (3) , 231-247
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950080302
Abstract
The stylized facts of macroeconomic time series can be presented by fitting structural time series models. Within this framework, we analyse the consequences of the widely used detrending technique popularised by Hodrick and Prescott (1980). It is shown that mechanical detrending based on the Hodrick–Prescott filter can lead investigators to report spurious cyclical behaviour, and this point is illustrated with empirical examples. Structural time‐series models also allow investigators to deal explicitly with seasonal and irregular movements that may distort estimated cyclical components. Finally, the structural framework provides a basis for exposing the limitations of ARIMA methodology and models based on a deterministic trend with a single break.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Asymptotic Distributions of Unit-Root Tests When the Process Is Nearly StationaryJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1991
- The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root HypothesisEconometrica, 1989
- The Seasonal Cycle and the Business CycleJournal of Political Economy, 1989
- Tests for Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo InvestigationJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1989
- The Cyclical Component of U. S. Economic ActivityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987
- Trends and Cycles in Macroeconomic Time SeriesJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1985
- Signal Extraction for Nonstationary Time SeriesThe Annals of Statistics, 1984
- The Signal Extraction Approach to Nonlinear Regression and Spline SmoothingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- Spurious Periodicity in Inappropriately Detrended Time SeriesEconometrica, 1981
- The Recent Productivity SlowdownBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1972