Reoperation as a Quality Indicator in Colorectal Surgery
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 245 (1) , 73-79
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000231797.37743.9f
Abstract
To describe unplanned procedures following colorectal cancer surgery that might be used as intermediate outcome measures, and to determine their association with mortality and length of stay. Variation in the quality of surgical care, especially for common illnesses like colorectal cancer, has received increasing attention. Nonfatal complications resulting in procedural interventions are likely to play a role in poor outcomes but have not been well explored. Cohort analysis of 26,638 stage I to III colorectal cancer patients in the 1992 to 1996 SEER-Medicare database. sociodemographics, tumor characteristics, comorbidity, and acuity. postoperative procedural intervention. Logistic regression identified patient characteristics predicting postoperative procedures and the adjusted risk of 30-day mortality and prolonged hospitalization among patients with postoperative procedures. A total of 5.8% of patients required postoperative intervention. Patient characteristics had little impact on the frequency of postoperative procedures, except for acute medical conditions, including bowel perforation (relative risk [RR] = 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5-3.6), obstruction (RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.4-1.8), and emergent admission (RR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1-1.4). After a postoperative procedure, patients were more likely to experience early mortality (RR = 2.4; 95% CI = 2.1-2.9) and prolonged hospitalization (RR = 2.2; 95% CI = 2.1-2.4). The most common interventions were performed for abdominal infection (31.7%; RR mortality = 2.9; 95% CI = 2.3-3.7), wound complications (21.1%; RR mortality = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.4-1.3), and organ injury (18.7%; RR mortality = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.1-2.3). Postoperative complications requiring additional procedures among colorectal cancer patients correlate with established measures of surgical quality. Prospective tracking of postoperative procedures as complication markers may facilitate outcome studies and quality improvement programs.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2003CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2003
- Can Administrative Data Be Used to Compare Postoperative Complication Rates Across Hospitals?Medical Care, 2002
- Measuring Complications of Cancer Treatment Using the SEER-Medicare DataMedical Care, 2002
- Locoregional recurrence and survival after curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colonJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
- Outcome After Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer in Department of Veterans Affairs HospitalsAnnals of Surgery, 1998
- Lothian and borders large bowel cancer project: Immediate outcome after surgery. The consultant surgeons and pathologists of the lothian and borders health boardsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Identifying Complications of Care Using Administrative DataMedical Care, 1994
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986