Comparison of Two Forms and Two Levels of Lasalocid with Monensin on Feedlot Cattle Performance

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
One growth and two finishing trials were conducted with beef steers to compare lasalocid sodium and monensin sodium. Pure lasalocid, mycelia-cake lasalocid and monensin, each added individually to commercial protein supplement blocks at 880 mg/kg, depressed (P<.05) block intake so that approximately 100 mg of each additive were consumed daily by each animal. Daily gain, feed intake and feed efficiency for steers receiving blocks containing additives did not differ from the corresponding measures for steers receiving control blocks. No differences were observed in diet dry matter digestibility, as determined with acid-insoluble ash as an internal marker. Both forms of lasalocid and monensin reduced (P<.05) the incidence and concentration of coccidia oocysts. By day 40, only one steer on each of the additivie treatments was shedding oocysts (4.2% of additive-supplemented animals), compared with 41.5% of the control steers. During trial 2, steers fed pure lasalocid gained faster and more efficiently (P<.05) than those fed the mycelia-cake lasalocid, monensin or control diets. The improvement in feed efficiency over the control value was 10.0, 3.4 and 4.0% with pure lasalocid, mycelia-cake lasalocid and monensin, respectively (P<.05). Steers fed mycelia-cake lasalocid had higher (PÃ.05) dressing percentages than those fed pure lasalocid or monensin. Dressing percentage was the only carcass measurement affected. In trial 3, lasalocid at 30 and 45 g/ton and monensin at 30 g/ton improved (PÃ.05) feed efficiency by 7.5, 11.0 and 8.2%, respectively. No significant differences in incidence or concentration of oocysts were observed between treatment groups in trial 3, probably because steers were in slatted floor pens. Copyright © 1982. American Society of Animal Science . Copyright 1982 by American Society of Animal Science