Limiting abuse and opportunism by mortgage servicers
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Housing Policy Debate
- Vol. 15 (3) , 753-784
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2004.9521519
Abstract
This article discusses the opportunistic and abusive behavior of some servicers of residential mortgages toward the borrowers whose loans they service. Such abuse includes claiming that borrowers are in default and attempting to foreclose even when payments are current, charging borrowers unwarranted late fees and other kinds of fees, force‐placing insurance even when borrowers already have a policy, and mishandling escrow funds. The causes of such practices and the market forces that can rein them in are discussed. A case study of one mortgage servicer describes its unfair treatment of borrowers and the reforms imposed by federal regulators and other market participants. Both regulatory agencies and ratings agencies appear to have increased their scrutiny of servicers’ behavior, and states have passed new legislation to limit abuse. The article concludes with a discussion of proposals for further reform should these steps prove inadequate.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Some Loans Are More Equal than Others: Third–Party Originations and Defaults in the Subprime Mortgage IndustryReal Estate Economics, 2002
- The Limits of Behavioral Theories of Law and Social NormsVirginia Law Review, 2000
- Modeling the Conditional Probability of Foreclosure in the Context of Single‐Family Mortgage Default ResolutionsReal Estate Economics, 1998
- Mortgage Default in Local MarketsReal Estate Economics, 1997
- Cost-benefit analysis of single-family foreclosure alternativesThe Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1996
- Efficient Mortgage Default Option Exercise: Evidence from Loss SeverityJournal of Real Estate Research, 1995
- Nonlegal Sanctions in Commercial RelationshipsHarvard Law Review, 1990
- Conflict and Cooperation in Long-Term ContractsCalifornia Law Review, 1987
- A Relational Theory of Secured FinancingColumbia Law Review, 1986
- Consumer Credit Regulation: A Creditor-Oriented ViewpointColumbia Law Review, 1968