Is Deidentification Sufficient to Protect Health Privacy in Research?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in American Journal of Bioethics
- Vol. 10 (9) , 3-11
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2010.494215
Abstract
(2010). Is Deidentification Sufficient to Protect Health Privacy in Research? The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 3-11.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Privacy Versus Public Health: The Impact of Current Confidentiality RulesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy ruleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2010
- The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic researchGenetics in Medicine, 2010
- Public Opinion about the Importance of Privacy in Biobank ResearchAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2009
- Currents in Contemporary EthicsJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2009
- Resolving Individuals Contributing Trace Amounts of DNA to Highly Complex Mixtures Using High-Density SNP Genotyping MicroarraysPLoS Genetics, 2008
- Automated de-identification of free-text medical recordsBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2008
- Rapidly Retargetable Approaches to De-identification in Medical RecordsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2007
- How (not) to protect genomic data privacy in a distributed network: using trail re-identification to evaluate and design anonymity protection systemsJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2004
- Encyclopedia of Bioethics.Population and Development Review, 1995