The Prognostic Value of Promontory Electric Auditory Brain Stem Response in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 21 (3) , 236-241
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200006000-00007
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that children with clear promontory electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (prom-EABRs) would outperform, after cochlear implantation, children who had no prom-EABR preoperatively. A prospective study was undertaken on 47 implanted children assigning them to two groups (group A: 35 children with a clear wave e-V in the preoperative prom-EABR and group B: 12 children with no prom-EABR). Speech perception and speech intelligibility were assessed annually up to 3 yr after implantation with the IOWA sentence test (level A and level B), Connected Discourse Tracking, Categories of Auditory Performance, and Speech Intelligibility Rating. t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the above outcome measures in the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups on any of the outcome measures at any interval. Moreover, the small differences observed showed no consistent trend toward either group of children. Further analysis revealed that the outcomes have not been affected by possible confounding factors (age at implantation, duration of deafness, preoperative unaided pure-tone thresholds, and number of inserted electrodes). The results suggest that children with no prom-EABR performed at levels comparable with children who had clear promontory responses preoperatively. The prognostic value of prom-EABR is limited and absence of a prom-EABR is not, by itself, a contraindication for cochlear implantation. However, in selected cases (congenital malformations, cochlear nerve dysplasia or suspected aplasia, narrow internal auditory canal, etc.) the presence of a prom-EABR is a positive finding in the assessment of candidates for cochlear implantation as it confirms the existence of intact auditory neurones.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Categories of Auditory Performance: Inter-User ReliabilityBritish Journal of Audiology, 1998
- Electrically Evoked Auditory Brain-Stem Response in Pediatric Patients With Cochlear ImplantsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1994
- Reliability of the Promontory Stimulation Test for the Preoperative Evaluation of Cochlear Implants: A Comparison with the Round Window Stimulation TestAuris Nasus Larynx, 1994
- Multivariate Predictors of Audiological Success with Multichannel Cochlear ImplantsAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1993
- Effects of Preoperative Electrical Stimulability and Historical Factors on Performance with Multichannel Cochlear ImplantAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1991
- Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem responseHearing Research, 1990
- Profound Sensorineural Deafness: A Histopathologic StudyAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1987
- Relation of concentrations of Haemophilus influenzae type b in cerebrospinal fluid to late sequelae of patients with meningitisThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1982
- Abnormalities of the auditory brainstem response in post-meningitic infants and childrenInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 1981
- A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speechThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978