Rehabilitative Sanctions for Drunk Driving: an Experimental Evaluation
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
- Vol. 20 (1) , 55-72
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002242788302000105
Abstract
Under the Tennessee DWI Probation Follow-up Demonstration Project, 4,126 per sons arrested for drunk driving (DWI) in Memphis were classified as either social or problem driners and were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: control, probation supervision, education/therapy, or supervision plus education/therapy. Each client was followed up for at least two years after referral to the project. It was concluded that the treatment programs were not effective in reducing rearrests for DWI or for other misdemeanors and felonies. Arguments can be made that the treatment programs were inapproppriate for many of the project's clients. However, strong arguments can also be made that any such experiments, re gardless of the treatments tested, are unlikely to produce significant treatment ef fects because of other aspects of the sanctioning process.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The traffic safety effectiveness of education programs for first offense drunk drivers: Final reportPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1982
- Evaluation of Recidivism DataEvaluation Quarterly, 1979
- A survey of covariance models for censored life data with an application to recidivism analysisCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1979
- Sanctions for the Drinking Driver: An Experimental StudyThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1974
- Regression Models and Life-TablesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1972
- Policy Evaluation and RecidivismLaw & Society Review, 1971
- Driver Behavior and Legal Sanctions: A Study of DeterrenceMichigan Law Review, 1969
- A Controlled Experiment on the Use of Court Probation for Drunk ArrestsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1967
- Impediments to Penal ReformThe University of Chicago Law Review, 1966