Equivalence Testing for Binomial Random Variables
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Statistician
- Vol. 55 (4) , 279-287
- https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001753272213
Abstract
The hypothesis of “no difference” between two populations is the appropriate null hypothesis in studies intended to show that populations differ. In studies intended to show that two populations are practically equivalent, the null hypothesis that a substantial difference between the populations exists is more appropriate. We consider eight tests of the null hypothesis that the absolute difference of two binomial random variables' success probabilities is at least a prespecified Δ > 0 versus the alternative that the difference is less than Δ. The tests considered are: six forms of the two one-sided test, a modified form of the Patel–Gupta test, and the likelihood ratio rest. The applicability of each test in a given setting depends on how well the test maintains its nominal size, the power of the test, and the ease with which it is implemented. Based on these criteria, we make recommendations for choosing among these tests.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- On Approximate and Exact Sample Sizes of Equivalence Tests for Binomial ProportionsBiometrical Journal, 1994
- Sample sizes for bioequivalence studiesStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non‐zero risk difference or non‐unity relative riskStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailabilityJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1987
- Parameter Orthogonality and Approximate Conditional InferenceJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1987
- Sample size graphs for “proving the null hypothesis”Controlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- A Problem of Equivalence in Clinical TrialsBiometrical Journal, 1984
- Binomial Confidence IntervalsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- A new procedure for testing equivalence in comparative bioavailability and other clinical trialsCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1983