A new Modified Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score for treatment decisions in basal ganglia hemorrhage—a randomized trial
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 36 (7) , 2151-2156
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e318173fc99
Abstract
To develop a Modified Intracerebral Hemorrhage (MICH) score to determine optimal cut-offs for conservative treatment vs surgical intervention for basal ganglia hemorrhage and to predict outcomes. Prospective randomized trial. A 1,720-bed medical center affiliated with a university. In all, 226 patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage who presented at our hospital from 2001-2005. Group A (n = 113) underwent endoscopic surgery; group B (n = 113) underwent conservative treatment. Score differences on the Glasgow Outcome Scale and 1-yr Barthel Index were analyzed by chi-square test and Student's t-tests. Cut-offs for MICH scoring were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves for calculating the Youden Index. The treatment odds ratio was analyzed by univariate, multivariate, and multiple logistic regressions. The optimal cut-off point for mortality was a MICH score > or = 3 in which the Youden Index is 0.66 (sensitivity, 76.3%; specificity, 89.8%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.897). The positive and negative predictive values were 81.8% and 86.3%, respectively. The treatment odds ratio for surgical treatment was 6.87 (95% confidence interval, 3.13-14.5) at MICH scores > or = 3. The best cut-off for good functional outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale > or = 4 or Barthel index > or = 55) was MICH > or = 2. Conservative treatment achieved a better mean Barthel Index at MICH = 0 or 1 than surgical treatment, p < .01. At MICH scores = 3 or 4, 6-month mortality for conservative treatment was higher than for surgical treatment, p < .01 and p = .04, respectively. At MICH scores of 5, all patients died. MICH scoring provides a simple, reliable system for treatment decisions regarding basal ganglia hemorrhage and may accurately predict functional outcomes. Conservative treatment is recommended for basal ganglia ICH patients with low MICH scores (0, 1) to preserve neurologic function. Surgery is recommended for patients with a midlevel MICH score to obtain better functional outcomes (MICH = 2) and to reduce mortality (MICH = 3 or 4). At MICH scores = 5, there are no indications for surgery.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Neuroendoscopic Surgery for Intracerebral Haemorrhage - Comparison with Traditional Therapiesmin - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, 2003
- Medical versus surgical therapy for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhageNeurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2002
- Surgical treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage (STICH)Neurology, 1998
- Surgery for Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Is It Safe and Effective?Stroke, 1997
- Surgery in primary supratentorial intracerebral hematoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trialsActa Neurologica Scandinavica, 1997
- Failure of Surgery to Improve Outcome in Hypertensive Putaminal HemorrhageArchives of Neurology, 1990
- The treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhageJournal of Neurosurgery, 1989
- Role of surgery in hypertensive intracerebral hematomaJournal of Neurosurgery, 1984
- PRIMARY INTRACEREBRAL HÆMORRHAGEThe Lancet, 1961