Change and the Social Science PhD: supervisors’ responses
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Oxford Review of Education
- Vol. 21 (2) , 195-206
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498950210205
Abstract
Since 1985 the social science PhD has undergone various changes instigated by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the main indigenous funder of social science doctoral education. These changes involve the imposition of a more restrictive time limit for the submission of PhD theses and, perhaps more radically, the introduction of compulsory training courses in research methods for students. The responses of PhD supervisors to these changes are portrayed in some depth and include views on the functions of the PhD, the costs and consequences of research training and stricter time limits. In addition, various disciplinary differences in relation to the above issues are examined. The paper concludes with the proposition that the impact of such changes is already significant and may well result in the delay of the development of research creativity amongst doctoral students.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Science in universities: Teaching, research and autonomyStudies in Higher Education, 1991
- Physicists on physicsStudies in Higher Education, 1990
- The process of the PhD: a study of the first year of doctoral studyResearch Papers in Education, 1989
- Private affluence and public austerity: motors for innovation in postgraduate training?Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1988