Factors that influence the recruitment of patients to Phase III studies in oncology
Open Access
- 17 September 2002
- Vol. 95 (7) , 1584-1591
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10864
Abstract
BACKGROUND The multiple determinants of a patient's decision to enter into a clinical trial have been explored largely from the perspectives of patients and their physicians. Little research has involved clinical research associates (CRAs) formally, despite their central role in the process of recruitment. The current study was initiated to explore the factors that influence the decision of patients with cancer regarding clinical trial entry, specifically from the perspective of the CRA. METHODS Two focus groups of CRAs from the Hamilton Regional Cancer Center were organized. A skilled facilitator guided both groups through exploratory and subsequent confirmatory phases of discussions, which were audiotaped for review and coding using a process of consensus employing intercoder triangulation. RESULTS The two groups identified a number of factors that they believed influenced the recruitment process. Numerous physician and patient factors were reaffirmed, such as the impression of the scientific merit of a study or the sense of personal benefit, respectively. More uniquely, CRAs identified information transfer within the informed consent process as a major aspect of their specialized role. It was believed that full disclosure of information, in terms of both the content and the techniques and styles of delivery, was an important predictor of recruitment success. The groups quickly reached consensus on which factors they believed were the most important overall with respect to influencing study recruitment. CONCLUSIONS CRAs appear to have a unique role in the process of recruiting patients to active clinical trials. They believe that they have an important influence on recruitment success. Further research to validate this impression is required, because, ultimately, a greater understanding of the relative roles of physician and patient factors and, potentially, CRA factors will be important in the development of ethical and supportive strategies to optimize the recruitment of patients with cancer into randomized clinical trials. Cancer 2002;95:1584–91. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10864Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients' Perceptions of Physicians Communication and Outcomes of the Accrual to Trial ProcessHealth Communication, 2000
- Attitudes to randomized clinical trials amongst out‐patients attending a medical oncology clinicHealth Expectations, 1999
- Capturing the Group Effect in Focus Groups: A Special Concern in AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 1994
- Offering the Option of Randomized Clinical Trials to Cancer Patients Who Overestimate Their Prognoses with Standard TherapiesCancer Investigation, 1993
- Viability of Cancer Clinical Research: Patient Accrual, Coverage, and Reimbursement: American Medical Association Council on scientific AffairsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1991
- Accrual to Clinical Trials1JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1988
- Physicians’ Reasons for Not Entering Eligible Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984