Nutritional Support Team vs Nonteam Management of Enteral Nutritional Support in a Veterans Administration Medical Center Teaching Hospital
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
- Vol. 10 (6) , 635-638
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607186010006635
Abstract
One hundred one patients receiving enteral nutritional support (ENS) by tube feeding during a 5‐month period were prospectively studied. Fifty patients were managed by a nutritional support team (T) and 51 patients were managed by the nonteam approach (NT). Demographics, primary diagnosis, chronic diseases, medical service, calculated basal energy expenditure (BEE), duration of ENS, and final patient disposition were recorded. Enteral formula, formula modifications, results of laboratory tests and calories delivered were obtained daily. Results of nitrogen balance studies were obtained when available and each patient was monitored for pulmonary, mechanical, gastrointestinal, and metabolic abnormalities.No significant difference was found between the team and nonteam managed groups in regard to total feeding days, mean feeding days per patient, total laboratory tests, laboratory tests per patient or laboratory tests per day. Significantly more team patients attained 1.2 times BEE (T = 47, NT = 38, p < 0.05) for a significantly greater period of time (T = 398 days, NT = 281 days, p < 0.05). Significantly more team patients achieved a measured positive nitrogen balance than nonteam patients (T = 42, NT = 1, p < 0.05). Formula modifications to correct nutritional or metabolic aberrations were made in 15 (30%) team patients and five (9.8%) nonteam patients (p < 0.05).The number of individual abnormalities (pulmonary, mechanical, gastrointestinal, and metabolic), as well as total abnormalities occurring in the team‐managed group, was significantly lower than in the nonteam managed group (160 us 695, p < 0.05). The results of the study indicate that team‐managed enteral nutritional support reduced abnormalities and is nutritionally more efficient when compared to a nonteam approach. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 10:635–638, 1986)This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consultative Total Parenteral Nutrition Teams: The Effect on the Incidence of Total Parenteral Nutrition‐Related ComplicationsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1984
- Complications Occurring during Enteral Nutrition Support: A Prospective StudyJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1983
- Metabolic Abnormalities in Patients Supported with Enteral Tube FeedingJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1981
- Death resulting from overzealous total parenteral nutrition: the refeeding syndrome revisitedThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1981
- Enteral Nutrition: Frequency of Formula ModificationJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1981
- Nutritional Support of the Hospitalized PatientJAMA, 1980
- Parenteral Nutrition Utilization: Evaluation of an Educational Protocol and Consult ServiceJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1979
- Parenteral nutrition utilization: evaluation of an educational protocol and consult serviceJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1979
- Enteral Hyperalimentation: An Alternative to Central Venous HyperalimentationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1979