A Comparison of the Quality of Maternity Care between a Health-Maintenance Organization and Fee-for-Service Practices
- 26 March 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 304 (13) , 784-787
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198103263041313
Abstract
An intense controversy surrounds the promotion of the health-maintenance organization (HMO) as an alternative to the traditional fee-for-service (FFS) system of medical care. Advocates of HMOs believe that this system can produce considerable savings without sacrificing the quality of care.1 , 2 Opponents have charged that HMOs keep costs down by "skimming" their enrollment from the younger and healthier segments of the population and by "skimping" on the provision of services even when they are medically indicated.3 An issue still under discussion is whether HMOs deliver health care of a quality comparable to that of the FFS sector.4 Using multiple indicators of . . .Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome of the delivery following an induced or spontaneous abortionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980
- How Do Health-Maintenance Organizations Achieve Their “Savings”?New England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Changing trends in cesarean sectionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1976
- Health Policy and the HMOThe Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1972
- Health Maintenance StrategyMedical Care, 1971
- Further Observations on Prematurity and Perinatal Mortality in a General Population and in the Population of a Prepaid Group Practice Medical Care PlanAmerican Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1960
- Comparison of Prematurity and Perinatal Mortality in a General Population and in the Population of a Prepaid Group Practice, Medical Care PlanAmerican Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1958