Abstract
In response to crisis conditions, and for eight months during 1895, the American government subcontracted its responsibility for the maintenance of monetary stability to a private syndicate of businessmen. This action and its results challenged both political and economic orthodoxy and represent one of the most important episodes in government-business relations during the nineteenth century. While previous studies of the Morgan-Belmont syndicate have emphasized its political and social costs, Professor Simon's concerns are to clarify and weigh the economic benefits of this remarkable arrangement.

This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit: