PROGNOSTIC INDICATORS FOR FAILURE OF SURVEILLANCE MANAGEMENT OF STAGE I NON‐SEMINOMATOUS GERM CELL TUMOURS
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 59 (2) , 119-122
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1989.tb01480.x
Abstract
Fifty-three patients presenting with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) of the testis were examined. Particular interest was directed towards the association of several morphological features of the primary tumour with metastatic disease, either at presentation or later in the course of the tumour. It is apparent from this study that the presence of vascular invasion in the primary tumour, high T stage (advanced local disease) and the presence of choriocarcinoma are poor prognostic signs in NSGCT. In such tumours presenting as clinical stage I, surveillance management may not be appropriate because of the high rate of relapse.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testicular Cancer: Prognostic Implications of Vascular InvasionJournal of Urology, 1987
- PREDICTING RELAPSE IN STAGE I NON-SEMINOMATOUS GERM CELL TUMOURS OF THE TESTISThe Lancet, 1987
- The Current Management of Testicular CancerBritish Journal of Urology, 1987
- Prognostic Factors in Non Semin Omatous Testicular CancerJournal of Urology, 1986
- Surveillance Alone for Patients with Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors of the Testis: Preliminary ResultsJournal of Urology, 1984
- Invasive Bladder Cancer: Tumor Configuration, Lymphatic Invasion and SurvivalJournal of Urology, 1983
- Tumor classification and size in germ-cell testicular cancer. Influence on the occurrence of metastasesCancer, 1982
- Blood vessel invasion and axillary lymph node involvement as prognostic indicators for human breast cancerCancer, 1982
- ORCHIDECTOMY ALONE IN TESTICULAR STAGE I NON-SEMINOMATOUS GERM-CELL TUMOURSThe Lancet, 1982
- Relevance of Biochemical Tumor Markers and Lymphadenectomy in Management of Non-Seminomatous Testis Tumors: Current PerspectiveJournal of Urology, 1980