Validation of Creatinine-Based Estimates of GFR When Evaluating Risk Factors in Longitudinal Studies of Kidney Disease
Open Access
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Vol. 17 (10) , 2900-2909
- https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2005101106
Abstract
Whereas much research has investigated equations for obtaining estimated GFR (eGFR) from serum creatinine in cross-sectional settings, little attention has been given to validating these equations as outcomes in longitudinal studies of chronic kidney disease. A common objective of chronic kidney disease studies is to identify risk factors for progression, characterized by slope (rate of change over time) or time to event (time until a designated decline in kidney function or ESRD). The relationships of 35 baseline factors with eGFR-based outcomes were compared with the relationships of the same factors with iothalamate GFR (iGFR)-based outcomes in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK; n = 1094). With the use of the AASK equation to calculate eGFR, results were compared between time to halving of eGFR or ESRD and time to halving of iGFR or ESRD (with effect sizes expressed per 1 SD) and between eGFR and iGFR slopes starting 3 mo after randomization. The effects of the baseline factors were similar between the eGFR- and iGFR-based time-to-event outcomes (Pearson R = 0.99, concordance R = 0.98). Small but statistically significant differences (P < 0.05, without adjustment for multiple analyses) were observed for seven of the 35 factors. Agreement between eGFR and iGFR was somewhat weaker, although still relatively high for slope-based outcomes (Pearson R = 0.93, concordance R = 0.92). Effects of covariate adjustment for age, gender, baseline GFR, and urine proteinuria also were similar between the eGFR and iGFR outcomes. Sensitivity analyses including death in the composite time-to-event outcomes or using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation instead of the AASK equation provided similar results. In conclusion, the data from the AASK provide tentative support for use of outcomes that are based on an established eGFR formula using serum creatinine as a surrogate for measured iGFR-based outcomes in analyses of risk factors for the progression of kidney disease.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Baseline Predictors of Renal Disease Progression in the African American Study of Hypertension and Kidney DiseaseJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2006
- Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Diabetic SubjectsDiabetes Care, 2005
- Predictive Performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft-Gault Equations for Estimating Renal FunctionJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2005
- Performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft-Gault Equations in the Estimation of GFR in Health and in Chronic Kidney DiseaseJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2005
- A Comparison of Iothalamate-GFR and Serum Creatinine-Based OutcomesJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2004
- Performance of Different Prediction Equations for Estimating Renal Function in Kidney TransplantationAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2004
- Measurement of renal function in chronic renal diseaseKidney International, 1990
- Regression Analysis of Multivariate Incomplete Failure Time Data by Modeling Marginal DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1989
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960