Evidence-Based Nutrition Principles and Recommendations for the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes and Related Complications
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 25 (1) , 148-198
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.1.148
Abstract
Historically, nutrition principles and recommendations for diabetes and related complications have been based on scientific evidence and diabetes knowledge when available and, when evidence was not available, on clinical experience and expert consensus. Often it has been difficult to discern the level of evidence used to construct the nutrition principles and recommendations. Furthermore, in clinical practice, many nutrition recommendations that have no scientific supporting evidence have been and are still being given to individuals with diabetes. To address these problems and to incorporate the research done in the past 8 years, this 2002 technical review provides principles and recommendations classified according to the level of evidence available. It reviews the evidence from randomized, controlled trials; cohort and case-controlled studies; and observational studies, which can also provide valuable evidence (1,2), and takes into account the number of studies that have provided consistent outcomes of support. In this review, nutrition principles are graded into four categories based on the available evidence: those with strong supporting evidence, those with some supporting evidence, those with limited supporting evidence and those based on expert consensus. Evidence-based nutrition recommendations attempt to translate research data and clinically applicable evidence into nutrition care. However, the best available evidence must still be moderated by individual circumstances and preferences. The goal of evidence-based recommendations is to improve the quality of clinical judgments and facilitate cost-effective care by increasing the awareness of clinicians and patients with diabetes of the evidence supporting nutrition services and the strength of that evidence, both in quality and quantity. Before 1994, the American Diabetes Association’s (ADA’s) nutrition principles and recommendations attempted to define an “ideal” nutrition prescription that would apply to everyone with diabetes (3,4,5). Although individualization was a major principle of all recommendations, it was usually done within defined …This publication has 661 references indexed in Scilit:
- Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)JAMA, 2001
- A dietary approach to prevent hypertension: A review of the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) studyClinical Cardiology, 1999
- The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1997
- Vitamin C Intake and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Persons with Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusPreventive Medicine, 1997
- Prandial Glycaemia After a Carbohydrate-rich Meal in Type I Diabetic Patients: Using the Rapid Acting Insulin Analogue [Lys(B28), Pro(B29)] Human InsulinDiabetic Medicine, 1996
- The Visceral Adiposity Syndrome in Japanese‐American MenObesity Research, 1994
- Exercise and ObesityObesity Research, 1993
- Physical activity and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in womenThe Lancet, 1991
- The health benefits of moderate alcohol consumption: A review of the literatureDrug and Alcohol Dependence, 1985
- Physical exercise and fuel homeostasis in diabetes mellitusDiabetologia, 1978