Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective
Top Cited Papers
- 22 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Osteoporosis International
- Vol. 19 (4) , 437-447
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0550-6
Abstract
Summary A United States-specific cost-effectiveness analysis, which incorporated the cost and health consequences of clinical fractures of the hip, spine, forearm, shoulder, rib, pelvis and lower leg, was undertaken to identify the 10-year hip fracture probability required for osteoporosis treatment to be cost-effective for cohorts defined by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. A 3% 10-year risk of hip fracture was generally required for osteoporosis treatment to cost less than $60,000 per QALY gained. Introduction Rapid growth of the elderly United States population will result in so many at risk of osteoporosis that economically efficient approaches to osteoporosis care warrant consideration. Methods A Markov-cohort model of annual United States age-specific incidence of clinical hip, spine, forearm, shoulder, rib, pelvis and lower leg fractures, costs (2005 US dollars), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment ($600/yr drug cost for 5 years with 35% fracture reduction) by gender and race/ethnicity groups. To determine the 10-year hip fracture probability at which treatment became cost-effective, average annual age-specific probabilities for all fractures were multiplied by a relative risk (RR) that was systematically varied from 0 to 10 until a cost of $60,000 per QALY gained was observed for treatment relative to no intervention. Results Osteoporosis treatment was cost-effective when the 10-year hip fracture probability reached approximately 3%. Although the RR at which treatment became cost-effective varied markedly between genders and by race/ethnicity, the absolute 10-year hip fracture probability at which intervention became cost-effective was similar across race/ethnicity groups, but tended to be slightly higher for men than for women. Conclusions Application of the WHO risk prediction algorithm to identify individuals with a 3% 10-year hip fracture probability may facilitate efficient osteoporosis treatment.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2007
- Report of Nationally Representative Values for the Noninstitutionalized US Adult Population for 7 Health-Related Quality-of-Life ScoresMedical Decision Making, 2006
- Universal Bone Densitometry Screening Combined with Alendronate Therapy for Those Diagnosed with Osteoporosis Is Highly Cost‐Effective for Elderly WomenJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2005
- Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UKBone, 2004
- A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture riskBone, 2004
- Adverse Outcomes of Osteoporotic Fractures in the General PopulationJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2003
- Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fracturesThe Lancet, 2002
- Cost-utility analyses of clinical preventive services11The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajpmonline.American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000
- Markov Models in Medical Decision MakingMedical Decision Making, 1993
- Hip Fracture Incidence and Mortality in New EnglandEpidemiology, 1991