Theoretical conformational analysis on Cyclo(prolyl‐phenylalanyl) peptides
- 1 April 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Biopolymers
- Vol. 16 (4) , 707-714
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1977.360160402
Abstract
Empirical energy calculations on cyclo(L‐Pro‐L‐Phe) and cyclo(L‐Pro‐D‐Phe) indicate that different conformations are possible for each molecule. The theoretical results are compared to ir, nmr, and crystallographic data. The interdependence between diketopiperazine ring and side‐chain conformations is also discussed.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crystal structure and conformation of the cyclic dipeptide cyclo-L-prolyl-D-phenylalanylActa Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials, 1976
- Why cyclic peptides? Complementary approaches to conformationsAccounts of Chemical Research, 1976
- Conformation of histidine model peptides. III. Chiroptical properties of cyclo‐L‐alanyl‐L‐histidine and cyclo‐L‐histidinyl‐L‐histidineBiopolymers, 1975
- A 13C spin‐lattice relaxation study of dipeptides containing glycine and proline: Mobility of the cyclic proline side chainBiopolymers, 1975
- Conformation of cyclic dipeptides from empirical energy calculationsBiopolymers, 1973
- The structures of five diketopiperazines from Aspergillus ustusTetrahedron, 1973
- Consistent force field calculations on 2,5-diketopiperazine and its 3.6-dimethyl derivativesBiopolymers, 1971
- Gemo, a computer program for the calculation of the preferred conformations of organic moleculesTetrahedron, 1971
- Molecular orbital calculations on the folding of cyclic dipeptides with aromatic and aliphatic side chainsBiopolymers, 1971
- Calculated minimum energy conformations of muscarineJournal of Molecular Biology, 1968