Effect of the “PAL” word prediction system on the quality and quantity of text generation
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Augmentative and Alternative Communication
- Vol. 8 (4) , 304-311
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619212331276343
Abstract
In the main, the value of rate-enhancement techniques in prostheses for people with severe speech disorders has been judged on the basis of simple measures such as rate of composition and keysaving. Comparative studies have not been conducted into long-term effects of the use of such systems. In addition the quality of the users' output can be as important as the quantity and the ease with which it can be produced. In this paper, long-term case studies of adults and children are discussed. Results show that a predictive word processing system can make valuable improvements to the quantity and quality of the written work of users with both physical impairments and spelling problems. In addition, some evidence has been found of the potential of orthographic predictive systems for assisting those with language disorders. It is argued that, in many clinical and educational situations, these effects can be more important than those indicated by simple measurements of rate enhancement and keysaving for such systems.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of message encoding techniques on recall by literate adults using AAC systemsAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1990
- Gaining the most from AAC's growing yearsAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1990
- Comparative analysis of fixed-vocabulary communication acceleration techniquesAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1987
- Adaptive and predictive techniques in a communication prosthesisAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1987
- Design rationale and evaluation of the Portable Anticipatory Communication Aid—PACAAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1987
- The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 1956