Peer Review Practices of Mass Communication Scholarly Journals
- 1 April 1990
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 14 (2) , 151-165
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9001400203
Abstract
Research and publication are important to today 's teacher-scholar. Gettingpublished in refereed journals is considered by many the surest way to tenure and promotion. Peer review has not been a popular area of study, but, increasingly, questions are being raised about current peer review practices in a variety of disciplines, including mass communication. This study examines peer review practices in mass communication. Results indicate that both researchers and referees have mixed feelings about peer review and about specific journals, but that they are dissatisfied with particular philosophies that underlie scholarship in the discipline.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Editor's ColumnPMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 1989
- The Publication Game: Why it is in part a Game of Luck, and How to be LuckyJournal of Geography, 1989
- A Profile of JMC Educators: Traits, Attitudes and ValuesThe Journalism Educator, 1988
- Research Article Productivity by Mass Communication ScholarsJournalism Quarterly, 1988
- The peer review process for theJournal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS)Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1987
- Comments on the Journal Peer Review SystemJournal of School Health, 1987
- Journal Peer ReviewNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Evaluating Scholarly Manuscripts in Journalism and CommunicationsJournalism Quarterly, 1982
- Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review systemCognitive Therapy and Research, 1977