Nevirapine‐ versus efavirenz‐based highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral‐naïve patients with advanced HIV infection
Open Access
- 10 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in HIV Medicine
- Vol. 5 (2) , 105-109
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2004.00195.x
Abstract
Objective To compare virological and immunological responses to nevirapine (NVP)‐based and efavirenz (EFV)‐based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in antiretroviral‐naïve patients with advanced HIV infection. Methods A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on antiretroviral‐naïve HIV‐infected patients whose pretreatment CD4 cell counts were less than 100 cells/μL or whose viral loads were greater than 100 000 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL. Results Baseline characteristics of patients in the NVP (n=24) and EFV (n=29) groups were not different. The proportion of patients with viral loads >100 000 copies/mL was higher in the EFV group. The probability of virological success estimated by the Kaplan‐Meier method showed that 3‐ and 6‐month success rates were 30.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.7–52.2%] and 63.1% (95% CI: 44.7–81.3%) for the NVP group. The corresponding values were 41.2% (95% CI: 25.8–61.0%) and 62.9% (95% CI: 45.7–80.1%) for the EFV‐based group. The median success times of the two groups were about 4 and 3 months (P=0.678), respectively, for NVP and EFV. Cox's proportional hazard was used after adjusting for age, previous opportunistic infections (OIs), and viral load at baseline, and showed that patients who received the NVP‐based regimen had about 25% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.75, 95% CI: 0.37–1.51] less chance of virological success than patients who received the EFV‐based regimen (P=0.415). The median times to CD4≥100 cells/μL were 5.6 and 4.4 months for the NVP‐ and EFV‐based regimens, respectively (log‐rank test, P=0.144). Conclusions NVP‐ and EFV‐based HAART regimens as initial regimens in patients with advanced HIV infection are effective and comparable, in term of virological and immunological responses. However, further large‐scale randomized controlled clinical trials in this group of patients with advanced HIV infection are needed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Therapeutic Responses to AZT + 3TC + EFV in Advanced Antiretroviral Naive HIV Type 1-Infected Ugandan PatientsAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2002
- Safety and Tolerance of Efavirenz in Different Antiretroviral Regimens: Results from a National Multicenter Prospective Study in 1,033 HIV-Infected PatientsHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2002
- Antiretroviral Treatment for Adult HIV Infection in 2002JAMA, 2002
- British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines for the treatment of HIV‐infected adults with antiretroviral therapyHIV Medicine, 2001
- New French guidelines for antiretroviral treatmentHIV Medicine, 2000
- Efavirenz plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine, Efavirenz plus Indinavir, and Indinavir plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine in the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Changing patterns of mortality across Europe in patients infected with HIV-1The Lancet, 1998
- Declining Morbidity and Mortality among Patients with Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Impact of protease inhibitors on AIDS-defining events and hospitalizations in 10 French AIDS reference centresAIDS, 1997
- Nevirapine, Zidovudine, and Didanosine Compared with Zidovudine and Didanosine in Patients with HIV-1 InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996