An Alternative Form of a Forced-Choice F Scale
- 1 June 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 16 (3) , 933-940
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.16.3.933
Abstract
A forced-choice form of the F scale was constructed and correlations were computed between the resulting scores and those from a “counterbalanced” form and its two components: the scores from embedded original Authoritarianism Scale items and the scores from embedded “reversed” items. Reliabilities of the forced-choice scale were .69 and .66 for two samples. It was observed that the forced-choice × “original” correlations were slightly lower than those reported by others end, more importantly, the forced-choice × “counterbalanced” scale correlations were of the order of .7, thus casting some doubt on the relative advantage of the forced-choice form over the “counterbalanced” form for selection of “high” authoritarians. In addition, evidence was presented indicating an advantage of a lateral form of FC scale over a vertical form.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Forced Choice Form of the F Scale-Free of Acquiescent Response SetSociometry, 1964
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959
- Is the F scale irreversible?The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958
- Components of variance due to acquiescence and content in the F scale measure of authoritarianism.Psychological Bulletin, 1958
- Authoritarianism or acquiescence?The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955
- Estimation of Test Reliability for Unrestricted Item Scoring MethodsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1952
- Test Reliability Estimated by Analysis of VariancePsychometrika, 1941
- Note On a Simplified Method of Computing Test ReliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1941