Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies
- 13 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 19 (24) , 3325-3336
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3325::aid-sim827>3.0.co;2-d
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 2000
- Are systematic reviews taking heterogeneity into account? An analysis from the Infectious Diseases Module of the Cochrane Library.Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2000
- False-Positive Results in Clinical Trials: Multiple Significance Tests and the Problem of Unreported ComparisonsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigatedBMJ, 1994
- Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go AwayAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993
- A Consumer's Guide to Subgroup AnalysesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Publication Bias and Dissemination of Clinical ResearchJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1989
- Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1988
- Interpretation of results from subset analyses within overviews of randomized clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1987