Position for women during second stage of labour
- 23 March 1999
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 2,p. CD002006
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002006
Abstract
For centuries, there has been controversy around whether being upright (sitting, birthing stools, chairs, squatting) or lying down have advantages for women delivering their babies. The objective of this review was to assess the benefits and risks of the use of different positions during the second stage of labour (i. e. from full dilatation of the cervix). Relevant trials are identified from the register of trials maintained by the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, and from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Trials were included which compared various positions assumed by pregnant women during the second stage of labour. Randomised and quasi-randomised trials with appropriate follow-up were included. Trials were independently assessed for inclusion, and data extracted, by the two authors. Disagreements would have been resolved by consensus with an editor. Meta-analysis of data is performed using the RevMan software. Results should be interpreted with caution as the methodological quality of the 18 trials was variable. Use of any upright or lateral position, compared with supine or lithotomy positions, was associated with: 1. Reduced duration of second stage of labour (12 trials - mean 5.4 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9 - 6.9 minutes). This was largely due to a considerable reduction in women allocated to use of the birth cushion. 2. A small reduction in assisted deliveries (17 trials - odds ratio (OR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 - 0.98). 3. A reduction in episiotomies (11 trials - OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64 - 0.84). 4. A smaller increase in second degree perineal tears (10 trials - OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.54). 5. Increased estimated risk of blood loss > 500ml (10 trials - OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34 - 3.32). 6. Reduced reporting of severe pain during second stage of labour (1 trial - OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41 - 0.83). 7. Fewer abnormal fetal heart rate patterns (1 trial - OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 - 0.91). The tentative findings of this review suggest several possible benefits for upright posture, with the possibility of increased risk of blood loss > 500ml. Women should be encouraged to give birth in the position they find most comfortable. Until such time the benefits and risks of various delivery positions are estimated with greater certainty when methodologically stringent trials data are available, then women should be allowed to make informed choices about the birth positions in which they might wish to assume for delivery of their babies.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Author's ReplyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1999
- Randomised trial comparing the upright and supine positions for the second stage of labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Delivery in an obstetric birth chair: a randomized controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Alternative positions in the second stage of labour: a randomized controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- A randomized study of the sitting position for delivery using a newly designed obstetric chairBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Maternal posture in second stage and fetal acid base statusBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
- A DECREASE IN FETAL pH DURING THE SECOND STAGE OF LABOUR, WHEN CONDUCTED IN THE DORSAL POSITIONBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1974
- THE INFLUENCE OF MATERNAL POSTURE AT BIRTH ON THE FETUSBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1973
- Effect of position changes on the intensity and frequency of uterine contractions during laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1960
- “Pelvic drive” in obstetrics: An x-ray study of 100 casesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1950