Long-term (≥8 years) outcome after palmaz-schatz stent implantation

This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:

• One-Year Follow-Up of The Stent Restenosis (STRESS I) Study 11This study was supported in part by Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems (Cordis), Incorporated, Warren, New Jersey.
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1998
• Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: One-year clinical follow-up of Benestent trial
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
• Four-year experience with Palmaz-Schatz stenting in coronary angioplasty complicated by dissection with threatened or present vessel closure.
  Circulation, 1994
• A Comparison of Balloon-Expandable-Stent Implantation with Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1994
• A Randomized Comparison of Coronary-Stent Placement and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1994
• Serial angiographic follow-up after palmaz-schatz stent implantation: Comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
• Restenosis after placement of Palmaz-Schatz stents in native coronary arteries. Initial results of a multicenter experience.
  Circulation, 1992
• Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: Immediate and long-term results from a large single-center experience
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
• Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
  Circulation, 1992
• Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent. Initial results of a multicenter study.
  Circulation, 1991