Claim Rates of Compensable Back Injuries by Age, Gender, Occupation, and Industry
- 15 July 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 23 (14) , 1572-1587
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199807150-00013
Abstract
Study Design. A retrospective cohort study of Michigan workers' compensation cases involving back injuries in 1986 and 1987 with incidence and outcome data. Objective. To determine claim rates by age, gender, and industry or occupation for compensable back injuries and to investigate the relation between occupation and return to work. Summary of Background Data. The cohort of 24,094 Michigan workers' compensation cases from 1986 and 1987 in which claimants were compensated for back injuries was reviewed. Compensation eligibility requires more than 7 days' disability after injury. Methods. Claim rates for back injuries by age, gender, and industry or occupation using employment data interpolated from 1980 and 1990 Census 1% Public Use Microdata Samples. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed for return to work in the first 8 weeks after injury, with occupation coded at the three-digit level. Results. All-age claim rates for Michigan compensable back injuries by occupation ranged between 0.03% and 1.7% annually (0.39% for all cases) and were generally higher in women in white collar occupations and in men in blue collar occupations. The claim rate peaked in men in the 25-34 year range, with the highest rates in manual labor occupations. The peak claim rates by age were less marked in women, tending to occur broadly throughout the 25-44-year range. Similar all-age values were recorded by industry. The male-to-female risk ratio over all occupations does not vary by age and is approximately 1.4:1. As the classification of occupation became more detailed, large differences in risk were documented within major occupation groups. The highest risk in this study was approximately 6% annually for 25-44 year old men in driver-sales (beverage truck drivers and delivery workers). Only 7 of 40 occupation categories showed a significant relative hazard for return to work in the first 8 weeks after injury, and these were blue collar occupations with earlier return than the reference sales category. For Michigan compensable back injuries, a rough estimate of the true annual incidence of new claims is 94% of the reported claim rate. Conclusions. The relative risk of compensable back injury is generally higher for females in white collar occupations, higher for males in blue collar occupations and approximately equal in service occupations. Although the risk of back injury is related to occupation, the same occupational factors do not operate as a barrier to return to work.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology of Acute Low Back Injury in Employees of a Large Home Improvement Retail CompanyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Patterns and Risk Factors for Sprains and Strains in Ontario, Canada 1990: An Analysis of the Workplace Health and Safety Agency Data BaseJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1996
- Self-Reported Low Back Symptoms in Urban Bus Drivers Exposed to Whole-Body VibrationSpine, 1992
- Isometric Lifting Strength As a Predictor of Industrial Back Pain ReportsSpine, 1989
- Descriptive Epidemiology of Low-back Pain and Its Related Medical Care in the United StatesSpine, 1987
- Back Injuries in Industry: A Retrospective StudySpine, 1986
- Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression—Influence of age and degenerationJournal of Biomechanics, 1986
- Assessment of Workers?? Compensation Claims for Back Strains/SprainsJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1984
- Epidemiology of musculoskeletal impairments and associated disability.American Journal of Public Health, 1984
- Authors?? ResponseJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1979